Tag Archives: TV

In the mail this weekend …

15 Jan

(c) ShotDeadintheHead

Mad Men time (or related ephemera) again … an offer to buy one of these mugs has just popped into my in-box ( available as a t-shirt too – why, hello, Peggy).

You can also get Mr Sterling, Mr Campbell (why, though?), Mr Draper,  Little Miss Betty and Little Miss Peggy immortalised in earthenware and 100% cotton.

And I received a copy of this book – Women’s Roles in Twentieth Century America – through the actual post today – together with an invitation to go along to the launch of the new Sky TV channel,  Sky Atlantic and attend a cinema based screening of their 1920s set flagship series Boardwalk Empire.

I was very excited,  as I don’t usually get to hang out at such meeja events, but, due to the PR connectivity of the TV channel and the book,  I’m somehow on the guest list as a blogger.  Fame at last.  However,  upon closer examination of the invitation (“we’d love to take you for a drink first before Prohibition kicks in …”) – I see that the meeting point is at that oh-so-glamorous venue,  Yates Wine Bar.

British readers will sense my hesitation immediately;  American readers: it’s somewhat the equivalent of holding an event in a Denny’s,  ie,  dialled down a fair way on the Glam-o-Meter.

(Unless of course that’s the point and it’s been converted into a speakeasy,  where they’re serving gin in teacups and the like).

Still,  at least I won’t have to dress up … I hope. No mention made of fancy dress required.

Watch this space … will report back –  if I can get there in time from my interim job on the other side of London.

Invisible woman syndrome

16 Sep

Let’s talk about role models.  I think it’s universally agreed that role models are A Good Thing,  especially for women;  they provide a sense that change is possible,  a glimpse of the future,  an alternative perspective on what life might be like “there”,  perhaps some tips and hints on how to get there.  When I was researching and then writing The Leaking Pipeline,  which featured interviews from 79 senior business women, all great role models, around the world,  I took and learned so much from their stories and their determination.

Of course,  role models can come in all shapes, sizes and walks of life,  as the PinkStinks campaign team demonstrate so admirably on their website,  which is in turn a great example of how to harness multi-media technology in this ever changing world.  When I was growing up, pre the computerised age,  my role models were the women I saw around me:  my mum (a mature student, a successful career woman in later life and now, in her sixties, a “sandwich generation” carer to both her grandsons and her own mother AND one of the applicants to volunteer at the 2012 London Olympics), teachers, librarians,  perhaps TV presenters such as Valerie Singleton.  I don’t really remember many women, other than actresses, on TV in the 1970s,  across the three channels to which we had access – Anna Ford and Angela Rippon read the news and that was about it.

So why am I pondering on this now?  Well,  a few months ago,  I watched a fabulous three part BBC4 series called Electric Dreams,  in which a family of six (parents and four children, including two daughters) spent a month replicating the arrival of the last thirty years’ worth of technology.  Their home was taken back to how it would have been,  in technology terms,  in the 1970s and they were stripped of TVs, mobile phones, computers, gaming consoles and all the associated domestic electrical gadgets: no microwaves, automatic washing machines or any other time and labour saving devices.  As each new day of the experiment arrived,  the time machine moved forward a year and the family took delivery of a new piece of technology – so we saw them getting to grips with early VCRs, black and white computer monitors, mobile phones the size of a brick and so on.

(c) BBC

The family were supported by a team of three technical gurus,  including Dr Gia Milinovich, who is a technology writer and self-confessed geek.  I thought she was fabulous in the series – clever,  funny,  great sense of history,  with a real appreciation of how technology has been such a huge enabler over the last thirty years.  The other two team members were blokes – see photo – so I think Gia served as a very positive role model for women in technology (and, perhaps,  for the two girls in the house).  I subsequently watched another three part BBC series which she presented (for which I can’t find a link – perhaps I dreamed it?) about the development and emergence of technology which made it seem really interesting and accessible, even to the non-Apple-owning types amongst us.

And I’m focusing on Gia because …? OK. Last month,  Gia wrote this article for the Guardian,  in which she highlighted how she has basically become invisible since her husband of six years,  rock star/God like physicist Prof. Brian Cox,  hit the media spotlight and became the acceptable (and sexy) face of popular science.

“When we first met”,  she writes,  “I was the expensively groomed television professional, working on mostly science and technology shows, and he was the newly appointed physics academic with a student’s wardrobe and a single bed.”

But, then:  “… he presented Wonders Of The Solar System and everything changed.”

She goes on to detail how her husband’s level of fame and recognition (in supermarkets, on the street) then escalated to the point where other women are zoning in on him in public and on Twitter and behaving as if Gia simply … doesn’t exist.

As if all of that wasn’t bad enough,  Gia has also had to take a hit in career terms,  as she explains that:

“…A few years ago, I started to notice that the more Brian appeared on TV, the less interesting I became to other people. I started to morph from Gia Milinovich, independent woman with her own life and separate bank account, into “Mrs Brian Cox”, then into “wife”. Pre-fame, I was asked for my opinions; now, I’m asked what Brian thinks.”

And,  circling back to our role models angle,  Gia has now decided to take a step back from continuing to work in TV,  describing here how she has found herself treated in a way which is doubtless only too familiar to women in corporate life – as if what she says has no value,  unless and until the very same words are uttered by a male colleague in the same meeting,  at which point they are fallen upon as if they are true pearl encrusted nuggets of gold.

“The respect for my professional abilities has declined in inverse proportion to the number of Google searches for “Is Prof Brian Cox divorced yet?”

“The first signs were there five years ago when Brian and I went to pitch some ideas to a producer at a well-known production company. I’d had a science-technology series broadcast on Channel 4 several months earlier, and Brian’s appearances as the science expert on This Morning were going very well.

“From the start, the producer’s attention was on Brian. Every time I spoke, he’d look at me as though I was interrupting their conversation. At one point, I came out with what I thought was an excellent idea. The producer again turned towards me, said nothing and then turned slowly back to Brian. About a minute later, Brian repeated my idea almost word for word and the producer told him it was brilliant.”

So,  how sad is this?  This clever, funny, educated woman,  a fabulous role model for women in science, women in TV,  women everywhere really,  has decided that –

“Brian has made a well-loved science series and I, well, until I work out how I fit into all of this, I’ll just continue washing his pants.”

Don’t do it, Gia.  Hang on in there – we need more women like you on TV!

Keep calm and –

8 Sep

- call Don Draper,  according to this rather cool t-shirt image …

(c) oldskoolhooligans.com

… which is also by way of a Public Service Announcement for UK readers,  reminding you that the new series (season 4) of Mad Men starts tonight on BBC 4 at 10pm.

Be there or be … well,  somewhere else with your martini and ashtray,  I suppose.

Returning soon to BBC4: Mad Men, series 4

25 Aug

I realise that,  based on the date of  this Guardian article,  appreciating that people are pretending to be Mad Men characters is a bit 2009,  but humour me;  I’m a relatively recent Twitter user and I just didn’t know that even-more-avid fans than me were actually,  you know, Tweeting as  Joan, Betty, Don and co.

What I also didn’t know was that the “Dons” and “Petes” would follow you back!

_DonDraper (_DonDraper) is now following your tweets on Twitter.

A little information about _DonDraper:

15869 followers
290 tweets
following 12110 people

If you want to follow them too,  the characters that I’ve randomly selected from amongst the many are: DonDraperSCDP,  bettydraper,  PeggyOlson, lanepryce,  SecretarySCDP, Sal_Romano and  (but of course) TheJoanHolloway.

Here’s a recent (and contemporary) “Don” Tweet:

“I saw a male stewardess lose his mind on the plane the other day. You should never hire a man to do a woman’s work.”

(More on the inherent sexism in MM in this piece in the Atlantic,  by the way).

In other Mad Men news,  and hard on the heels of the call from Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone for young girls to emulate Christina Hendricks’ figure rather than, say,  Paris Hilton’s,  here’s what the New Statesman has to say about Mattel’s new range of MM Barbie dolls:

“ … the Joan doll appears substantially underweight, her lollipop head wobbling on spindly plastic limbs, shrinking Hendricks’s curves into a body type that the toy company claims is more in keeping with “the aesthetic” of the show. Peggy Olson, a mousy-but-talented copywriter in Mad Men, has not been made into a doll, because frumpy, difficult and demanding women never get to be Barbie, whatever their accomplishments.”

Poor Peggy.

Anyway,  season 4 is apparently starting on BBC4 shortly.  Can’t wait …

Rain on the 4th of July

6 Jul

Today’s the last day of our quick hop across to Florida on holiday – a lovely break in many ways,  but not an unqualified success in others.

As a word of warning to any other non-US passport holders: be prepared for delays and possible problems at Immigration if you’ve changed your passport recently.  TLS and I landed at Miami at 4pm local time last Thursday,  very much looking forward to our week’s holiday here over the 4th July weekend. We’d had an uneventful flight, which had landed on time and we were early in the immigration queue.  I was processed with no problems and went on ahead to retrieve our bags,  but TLS was asked to accompany a Homeland Security employee to an office for what was described as a “brief chat” in order to “discuss” an apparent discrepancy on his passport.

He managed to tell me all of this via text before he (and he alone, out of the hundred-odd other people in the holding pen) had his phone confiscated … and we then spent FOUR HOURS sitting in separate parts of Miami airport each wondering what was happening. I was going out of my mind with worry, particularly after an airline official took the time and trouble to tell me that he might be deported (!) – a great start to our much anticipated holiday.

It eventually transpired that there are still apparently teething problems with the new ESTA system – the recently introduced on-line visa waiver process which replaces the old green form which one used to have to fill in on the plane.  We each applied for ESTAs (and were granted them) last September when we went over to California.  Since then,  TLS has replaced his passport,  so he naturally applied for a new ESTA – and, again,  was granted one on-line. Unfortunately, the ESTA software isn’t sophisticated enough (or perhaps doesn’t “talk” to other systems)  and doesn’t know when a passport has expired – all it sees is that there are TWO ESTAs live in the system,  each attached to different passports.

Ding ding!

Problem!

Arrest the innocent traveller and treat him like a criminal! Retain him in a hot, airless room with no facilities for four hours,  accuse him of applying for a new ESTA with an old passport … then accept that actually,  the correct passport was used – and then release him without a single word of apology.

So that was how our holiday started.

We were so exhausted by the time we got to our eventual destination in Fort Lauderdale that I didn’t even notice (or care) that we’d been allocated a room over the valet parking desk …. not the tranquil location for which we’d been hoping.

But we have subsequently learned that the one time when everyone will want to use valet parking is when there’s heavy rain – and what have we had for the majority of our time here? That’s right: the heaviest rain seen in this area for about 60 years!  Whilst London basks in blue skies and balmy temperatures,  southern Florida has 90 degrees F heat, 99% humidity and,  yesterday at least,  the most rain falling in one day since 1952.

But it’s not all bad news … we are two blocks from a branch of Borders (where the in-house coffee shop prepares delicious cinnamon lattes) and I’ve been doing a lot of reading,  due to being trapped indoors by the rain.  Here’s some of the books I’ve bought:

Half the Sky – Nicholas D Kristof & Sheryl WuDunn: not available in paperback in the UK for another month,  I’ve been wanting to read this ever since it first came out.

“A brilliantly argued case for investing in the health and autonomy of women worldwide …”

Every Last One – Anna Quindlen : a new novel from one of my favourite novelists, a brilliantly nuanced portrayal of family life and shocking, terrifying change.

1959 – The Year Everything Changed – Fred Kaplan : Not the 1960s, apparently,  but the year earlier which  “ushered in the wave of tremendous cultural, political, and scientific shifts that would play out in the decades that followed …”

Purchased because it was placed (nice work, Borders) on the table adjacent to:

Mad Men and Philosophy – edited by Ron Carveth and James B South: a series of essays which look at the philosophical themes and issues which underpin my favourite TV show.

A Short History of Women – Kate Walbert: Tracing five generations of one family from 1899 through the present, this shows the myriad ways in which women have challenged the status quo, succumbed to it, or made their statements, for better or worse –  their stories here existing almost as a series of interrelated short stories.

And finally:

Hope in a Jar – Beth Harbison: this was perfect fluffy reading for a very wet, stuck indoors afternoon; not great,  but it did give me the earworm of the holiday. It’s the story of two high school friends, Allie and Olivia who have gone their separate ways as adults but who (** cliché alert **) reconnect at their high school reunion. Each chapter starts with a tag line from a past or current ad campaign for a beauty product (“Because you’re worth it!”) and one such chapter got me first singing “It’s gonna be an Avivance night …” and then rushing to YouTube to view the original 70s advert.

Check it out, feel amazed at the world it portrays (housewife whipping off headscarf and apron, adding scent and lipstick,  welcoming home her husband …) and then try and stop it going roundandroundandround in. Your. Head.

I wonder if this is the type of campaign on which Peggy Olson worked in the 1970s?

On Pill popping

7 Jun

Over the last ten years or so,  “fertility” to many of my female friends, colleagues and wider circle of acquaintances has often been about encouraging the arrival of babies,  rather than preventing them.

Inadvertently, I’ve become familiar with words and phrases like IVF, surrogacy, Clomid, cervical mucus and the like.  Although two-thirds of British women in the 20-24 age group take the Pill, when you’re in your 40s (or even in your late 30s),  you tend not to do so, either by virtue of your age (and weight, or smoking status) or because you actively want to have children and so popping a daily pill from its little multi-coloured blister pack is an act from the past.

In series one of iconic TV show “Mad Men”,  there’s a scene where ambitious Peggy,  newly working in Manhattan and determined to be independent,  goes to see a doctor (who smokes throughout her examination – another example of how this visually stunning TV show uses props to invoke a sense of time, place and era) in order to obtain the Pill.

It’s the early 1960s and,  for the first time, there are doctors who will provide (unmarried) girls like Peggy with the tool to free them from their fertility.

I’m nearly as old as the Pill,  a fact of which I was reminded by this article in the weekend’s Observer,  which celebrates the Pill’s 50th birthday and reminds us of how far we’ve come since Peggy’s day. How about this quote?

“Well into the 1970s, women in Britain and America were still pretending to be married in order to get a prescription; some used to pass around the same battered wedding ring in the doctor’s waiting room.”

And as novelist Margaret Drabble comments:

“I think I would have had a child a year if I hadn’t started taking it.”

So, happy golden birthday to the Pill, an iconic symbol of late 20th century autonomy for women.

Want to be on TV, ladies?

3 Jun

Just received this press release – I only qualify for a few of the criteria,  but maybe you score on two for two:

Are you stylish and over forty but fed up of what’s on offer on the high street? When you shop for fashion is it not as much fun as it used to be? Retail guru and television presenter Mary Portas is about to start filming a new Channel 4 TV series and wants to speak to you. The series will follow Mary’s quest to fill the gap in the fashion market for fabulous, forty-plus women. Mary believes that women like her – strident, confident forty-plus women – have dropped off the fashion and retail industry’s radar. Mary wants to put them back at the centre of the retail industry and give them the same fabulous shopping experience of women half their age.

As part of the television series Mary is looking for a group of opinionated women to act as her focus group, advising her on anything from where to buy the best fitting dress to road testing whole fashion collections.

If you’re interested in being involved please email maryportas@optomen.com with your name, contact details and why you’d like to be part of the show.

International Women’s Day – minus one day

7 Mar

Tomorrow is the 100th celebration of International Women’s Day,  and I’ve been really interested to note the extent to which it, as an event, has gained popularity and awareness over the last couple of years.  One of the first projects I ever undertook when I started working in gender diversity around five years ago was a global survey in order to understand which countries celebrated (or even,  were aware of ) IWD and I remember that the results made quite depressing reading. My colleagues (and these were people in senior diversity and HR roles) hadn’t even heard of IWD in countries such as the US, Canada and Australia; it’s commemorated on a different day altogether in South Africa (there it’s “National Women’s WEEK” each August, as I witnessed at events in Jo’burg and Cape Town in 2008) and in the UK it was celebrated but in a very low key way,  with only a few corporates getting on board and doing something to mark the economic, political and social achievements of women past, present and future.

It was (and is) marked in a big way in countries like Russia and China,  where it’s a public holiday,  and quite a few western European countries also make it a social occasion,  with activities tied into fund raising for women’s charities,  but there was no sense at all of it being a global multi-media event.

Fast forward to this year,  and I’ve seen references all over the press,  even in the mass market tabloid papers – where it perhaps has most impact in terms of readership numbers.  From the official IWD website,  you can see that Reuters are on-board as a media partner and there are things happening all over the world,  including in many of the countries where just a few short years ago IWD was a relative non-event. I’ve been invited to celebrations in London, New York and Bangalore; of course,  I am actually going to the London one,  which is being hosted by Plan and the Africa All Party Parliamentary Group at the House of Commons and is a lunch thing to “Celebrate the Potential of Young African Women.”  Click here to read more about what Plan are doing to help girls in Africa and elsewhere complete their education.

I’m then legging it across town to join in the Fawcett Society’s photo shoot, which they’re organising to support their new pre-Election campaign, “What About Women?”. We all have to wear our FS “This is what a feminist looks like” t-shirt,  so I really hope the weather warms up a bit …

My favourite TV channel (it shows “Mad Men”!) is BBC4,  who are truly brilliant at creating themed programming strands: a week of shows from the BBC archive on any one of a number of concepts; prog rock, India, advertising, blues music and Islam, to name but a few recent memorable groupings.

Starting tomorrow,  and this surely has to be to commemorate IWD,  even though they’re not explicitly saying so,  is a week of programmes about women and feminism – most of which will be repeated if you miss them tomorrow night and/or are also showing on BBC2.  I’m setting Sky+  for the all-female audienced version of “Question Time” later in the week (still only ONE woman on the panel itself, though – why? Click here  to suggest more female panellists) and for Vanessa Engle’s three part documentary series on the impact of feminism called, simply, “Women”.

Part one is set in the 70s and is about what were then known (usually disparagingly) as “women’s libbers”.  Also from that era is Monday night’s repeat of a documentary on the 1976 Grunwick strike,  now regarded as a key moment in union history and one at which female and Asian workers first tested and protested their employment rights.

Check out the BBC4 listings (or iPlayer) if you’re in the UK,  there’s some great stuff in there from the amazing BBC archive.

“All the world’s a stage …

30 Oct

… and all the men and women merely players.”

And this link to a Vanity Fair article on the difficulties experienced by female writers trying to break into the closed circle world of writing for the US male chat show hosts shows that the issues faced by women in corporate life are no different.

October 2009: Nell Scovell on David Letterman Hollywood: vanityfair.com

This bit particularly resonated with me; swap “late-night-TV” for “investment banking” and “writers” for “executives” and the identikit situation is more than clear:

“One frequent excuse you hear from late-night-TV executives is that “women just don’t apply for these jobs.” And they certainly don’t in the same numbers as men. But that’s partly because the shows often rely on current (white male) writers to recommend their funny (white male) friends to be future (white male) writers.”

OK. I do concur that perhaps male investment bankers may not be as funny as the guys who knock out the gags for Jay Leno’s monologue. But apart from that … same scenario, different dress code, yes?

The future’s Green, the future’s female

25 Sep

I’m still catching up on emails and news stories from earlier this month, but I was pleased to see Green Party MEP Caroline Lucas (and, upon checking out her website, I note that I’m almost in her consituency, I think) calling for equal representation between men and women at the top level of European politics.

Brave woman – she’s calling for quotas.

Writing to PM Gordon Brown, Ms Lucas insisted that equality in politics could result in more women in business jobs and other top ranking positions in society.

She said: “European policies at the highest level need to unequivocally reflect the needs and aspirations of all Europeans. The new face of the European Union must reflect the fundamental European values of justice and equality.”

The European Summit is set to be held on October 29th and 30th, with the highest positions within the European Parliament being decided at the event.

I am making a diary note …

Last night I also caught up on BBC2‘s dramatisation of “The Last Days of Lehman Brothers”, which was an excellent clip through the events of September 2008 which led to the collapse of that once mighty investment bank. As I always do, I took a quick headcount, looking for the women, and counted three: two secretaries, one (dormant) wife. Pale, male and stale? Or, put another way, a reminder of the accuracy of Nicholas Kristof’s New York Times op-ed column earlier this year:

“Wall Street is one of the most male-dominated bastions in the business world; senior staff meetings resemble a urologist’s waiting room.”

Well, quite.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers